Skip to content
uswages .org

Forest And Conservation Workers Salary: Hawaii vs Virginia

Forest And Conservation Workers earn a median of $56,330 in Hawaii and $54,560 in Virginia. That is a nominal gap of $1,770 (+3.2%), with Hawaii paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$56,330
Hawaii median
$51,232 after COL
$54,560
Virginia median
$53,964 after COL
+3.2%
Nominal gap
Hawaii leads
-5.1%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Hawaii pays $1,770 more per year than Virginia for forest and conservation workers, a gap of +3.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Virginia actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,732 more in national-price-level terms (a +5.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for forest and conservation workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Forest And Conservation Workers

Hawaii

Median salary
$56,330
Mean salary
$57,470
Employment
60
Location quotient
2.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$51,232
Regional Price Parity
110.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Forest And Conservation Workers page for Hawaii →

Forest And Conservation Workers

Virginia

Median salary
$54,560
Mean salary
$52,750
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$53,964
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Forest And Conservation Workers page for Virginia →

Related pages

Keep digging into forest and conservation workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.