Skip to content
uswages .org

Forest And Conservation Workers Salary: South Dakota vs Idaho

Forest And Conservation Workers earn a median of $38,210 in South Dakota and $59,460 in Idaho. That is a nominal gap of $21,250 (-35.7%), with Idaho paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$38,210
South Dakota median
$43,133 after COL
$59,460
Idaho median
$62,266 after COL
-35.7%
Nominal gap
Idaho leads
-30.7%
Adjusted gap
Idaho leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Idaho pays $21,250 more per year than South Dakota for forest and conservation workers, a gap of +35.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Idaho still comes out ahead, with roughly $19,132 of extra purchasing power (+30.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for forest and conservation workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Forest And Conservation Workers

South Dakota

Median salary
$38,210
Mean salary
$41,060
Employment
490
Location quotient
27.54
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$43,133
Regional Price Parity
88.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Forest And Conservation Workers page for South Dakota →

Forest And Conservation Workers

Idaho

Median salary
$59,460
Mean salary
$54,650
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$62,266
Regional Price Parity
95.5%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Forest And Conservation Workers page for Idaho →

Related pages

Keep digging into forest and conservation workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.