Skip to content
uswages .org

Foresters Salary: Alaska vs Iowa

Foresters earn a median of $87,210 in Alaska and $83,000 in Iowa. That is a nominal gap of $4,210 (+5.1%), with Alaska paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$87,210
Alaska median
$85,200 after COL
$83,000
Iowa median
$94,574 after COL
+5.1%
Nominal gap
Alaska leads
-9.9%
Adjusted gap
Iowa leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Alaska pays $4,210 more per year than Iowa for foresters, a gap of +5.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Iowa actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $9,374 more in national-price-level terms (a +9.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for foresters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Foresters

Alaska

Median salary
$87,210
Mean salary
$86,060
Employment
80
Location quotient
3.85
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$85,200
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Foresters page for Alaska →

Foresters

Iowa

Median salary
$83,000
Mean salary
$83,390
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$94,574
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Foresters page for Iowa →

Related pages

Keep digging into foresters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.