Skip to content
uswages .org

Fundraisers Salary: Massachusetts vs California

Fundraisers earn a median of $79,060 in Massachusetts and $79,710 in California. That is a nominal gap of $650 (-0.8%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$79,060
Massachusetts median
$74,756 after COL
$79,710
California median
$71,992 after COL
-0.8%
Nominal gap
California leads
+3.8%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $650 more per year than Massachusetts for fundraisers, a gap of +0.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Massachusetts actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,764 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.8% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fundraisers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fundraisers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$79,060
Mean salary
$84,270
Employment
6,160
Location quotient
2.37
Jobs per 1,000
1.7
COL-adjusted median
$74,756
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fundraisers page for Massachusetts →

Fundraisers

California

Median salary
$79,710
Mean salary
$86,320
Employment
12,860
Location quotient
0.99
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$71,992
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fundraisers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into fundraisers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.