Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Fundraising Managers Salary: Vermont vs New Jersey

Fundraising Managers earn a median of $129,770 in Vermont and $137,440 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $7,670 (-5.6%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$129,770
Vermont median
$132,475 after COL
$137,440
New Jersey median
$126,318 after COL
-5.6%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
+4.9%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $7,670 more per year than Vermont for fundraising managers, a gap of +5.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $6,157 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for fundraising managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Fundraising Managers

Vermont

Median salary
$129,770
Mean salary
$128,800
Employment
130
Location quotient
1.82
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$132,475
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fundraising Managers page for Vermont →

Fundraising Managers

New Jersey

Median salary
$137,440
Mean salary
$149,040
Employment
790
Location quotient
0.78
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$126,318
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Fundraising Managers page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into fundraising managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.