Skip to content
uswages .org

Gambling Cage Workers Salary: Nevada vs Maryland

Gambling Cage Workers earn a median of $38,570 in Nevada and $47,930 in Maryland. That is a nominal gap of $9,360 (-19.5%), with Maryland paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$38,570
Nevada median
$38,578 after COL
$47,930
Maryland median
$45,665 after COL
-19.5%
Nominal gap
Maryland leads
-15.5%
Adjusted gap
Maryland leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Maryland pays $9,360 more per year than Nevada for gambling cage workers, a gap of +19.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Maryland still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,087 of extra purchasing power (+15.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling cage workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Cage Workers

Nevada

Median salary
$38,570
Mean salary
$39,570
Employment
2,050
Location quotient
14.25
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$38,578
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Cage Workers page for Nevada →

Gambling Cage Workers

Maryland

Median salary
$47,930
Mean salary
$45,520
Employment
280
Location quotient
1.10
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$45,665
Regional Price Parity
105.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Cage Workers page for Maryland →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling cage workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.