Skip to content
uswages .org

Gambling Managers Salary: Massachusetts vs New York

Gambling Managers earn a median of $100,460 in Massachusetts and $102,350 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $1,890 (-1.8%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$100,460
Massachusetts median
$94,991 after COL
$102,350
New York median
$94,838 after COL
-1.8%
Nominal gap
New York leads
+0.2%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $1,890 more per year than Massachusetts for gambling managers, a gap of +1.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Massachusetts actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $153 more in national-price-level terms (a +0.2% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Managers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$100,460
Mean salary
$112,820
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.34
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$94,991
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Managers page for Massachusetts →

Gambling Managers

New York

Median salary
$102,350
Mean salary
$112,230
Employment
180
Location quotient
0.57
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$94,838
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Managers page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.