Skip to content
uswages .org

Gambling Managers Salary: Texas vs New Jersey

Gambling Managers earn a median of $106,670 in Texas and $101,470 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $5,200 (+5.1%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$106,670
Texas median
$109,904 after COL
$101,470
New Jersey median
$93,259 after COL
+5.1%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
+17.8%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $5,200 more per year than New Jersey for gambling managers, a gap of +5.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Texas still comes out ahead, with roughly $16,646 of extra purchasing power (+17.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Managers

Texas

Median salary
$106,670
Mean salary
$110,900
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.13
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$109,904
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Managers page for Texas →

Gambling Managers

New Jersey

Median salary
$101,470
Mean salary
$111,510
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.92
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$93,259
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Managers page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.