Skip to content
uswages .org

Gambling Service Workers, All Other Salary: Alaska vs Florida

Gambling Service Workers, All Other earn a median of $38,730 in Alaska and $40,530 in Florida. That is a nominal gap of $1,800 (-4.4%), with Florida paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$38,730
Alaska median
$37,837 after COL
$40,530
Florida median
$39,192 after COL
-4.4%
Nominal gap
Florida leads
-3.5%
Adjusted gap
Florida leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Florida pays $1,800 more per year than Alaska for gambling service workers, all other, a gap of +4.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Florida still comes out ahead, with roughly $1,355 of extra purchasing power (+3.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for gambling service workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Gambling Service Workers, All Other

Alaska

Median salary
$38,730
Mean salary
$39,740
Employment
700
Location quotient
23.67
Jobs per 1,000
2.2
COL-adjusted median
$37,837
Regional Price Parity
102.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Service Workers, All Other page for Alaska →

Gambling Service Workers, All Other

Florida

Median salary
$40,530
Mean salary
$47,260
Employment
590
Location quotient
0.66
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$39,192
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Gambling Service Workers, All Other page for Florida →

Related pages

Keep digging into gambling service workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.