Skip to content
uswages .org

Genetic Counselors Salary: Arizona vs Washington

Genetic Counselors earn a median of $102,730 in Arizona and $102,920 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $190 (-0.2%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$102,730
Arizona median
$102,039 after COL
$102,920
Washington median
$96,175 after COL
-0.2%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
+6.1%
Adjusted gap
Arizona leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $190 more per year than Arizona for genetic counselors, a gap of +0.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Arizona actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $5,864 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.1% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for genetic counselors in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Genetic Counselors

Arizona

Median salary
$102,730
Mean salary
$104,110
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.64
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$102,039
Regional Price Parity
100.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Genetic Counselors page for Arizona →

Genetic Counselors

Washington

Median salary
$102,920
Mean salary
$110,030
Employment
100
Location quotient
1.16
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$96,175
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Genetic Counselors page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into genetic counselors from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.