Skip to content
uswages .org

Geographers Salary: California vs Texas

Geographers earn a median of $114,460 in California and $79,170 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $35,290 (+44.6%), with California paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$114,460
California median
$103,378 after COL
$79,170
Texas median
$81,571 after COL
+44.6%
Nominal gap
California leads
+26.7%
Adjusted gap
California leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, California pays $35,290 more per year than Texas for geographers, a gap of +44.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, California still comes out ahead, with roughly $21,807 of extra purchasing power (+26.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for geographers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Geographers

California

Median salary
$114,460
Mean salary
$114,310
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.48
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$103,378
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Geographers page for California →

Geographers

Texas

Median salary
$79,170
Mean salary
$84,830
Employment
180
Location quotient
1.39
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$81,571
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Geographers page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into geographers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.