Skip to content
uswages .org

Geological Technicians, Except Hydrologic Technicians Salary: Nevada vs Indiana

Geological Technicians, Except Hydrologic Technicians earn a median of $73,700 in Nevada and $79,290 in Indiana. That is a nominal gap of $5,590 (-7.1%), with Indiana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$73,700
Nevada median
$73,715 after COL
$79,290
Indiana median
$84,958 after COL
-7.1%
Nominal gap
Indiana leads
-13.2%
Adjusted gap
Indiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Indiana pays $5,590 more per year than Nevada for geological technicians, except hydrologic technicians, a gap of +7.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Indiana still comes out ahead, with roughly $11,242 of extra purchasing power (+13.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for geological technicians, except hydrologic technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Geological Technicians, Except Hydrologic Technicians

Nevada

Median salary
$73,700
Mean salary
$75,170
Employment
260
Location quotient
3.79
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$73,715
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Geological Technicians, Except Hydrologic Technicians page for Nevada →

Geological Technicians, Except Hydrologic Technicians

Indiana

Median salary
$79,290
Mean salary
$78,720
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$84,958
Regional Price Parity
93.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Geological Technicians, Except Hydrologic Technicians page for Indiana →

Related pages

Keep digging into geological technicians, except hydrologic technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.