Skip to content
uswages .org

Graphic Designers Salary: Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT vs Napa, CA

Graphic Designers earn a median of $81,800 in Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT and $79,090 in Napa, CA. That is a nominal gap of $2,710 (+3.4%), with Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$81,800
Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT median
$76,546 after COL
$79,090
Napa, CA median
$70,268 after COL
+3.4%
Nominal gap
Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT leads
+8.9%
Adjusted gap
Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT pays $2,710 more per year than Napa, CA for graphic designers, a gap of +3.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,277 of extra purchasing power (+8.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for graphic designers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Graphic Designers

Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT

Median salary
$81,800
Mean salary
$79,040
Employment
650
Location quotient
1.27
Jobs per 1,000
1.6
COL-adjusted median
$76,546
Regional Price Parity
106.9%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Graphic Designers page for Bridgeport-Stamford-Danbury, CT →

Graphic Designers

Napa, CA

Median salary
$79,090
Mean salary
$79,990
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.56
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$70,268
Regional Price Parity
112.6%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Graphic Designers page for Napa, CA →

Related pages

Keep digging into graphic designers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.