Skip to content
uswages .org

Graphic Designers Salary: Rhode Island vs California

Graphic Designers earn a median of $78,220 in Rhode Island and $75,130 in California. That is a nominal gap of $3,090 (+4.1%), with Rhode Island paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$78,220
Rhode Island median
$76,476 after COL
$75,130
California median
$67,856 after COL
+4.1%
Nominal gap
Rhode Island leads
+12.7%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Rhode Island pays $3,090 more per year than California for graphic designers, a gap of +4.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Rhode Island still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,620 of extra purchasing power (+12.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for graphic designers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Graphic Designers

Rhode Island

Median salary
$78,220
Mean salary
$78,900
Employment
750
Location quotient
1.17
Jobs per 1,000
1.5
COL-adjusted median
$76,476
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Graphic Designers page for Rhode Island →

Graphic Designers

California

Median salary
$75,130
Mean salary
$86,800
Employment
27,390
Location quotient
1.18
Jobs per 1,000
1.5
COL-adjusted median
$67,856
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Graphic Designers page for California →

Related pages

Keep digging into graphic designers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.