Skip to content
uswages .org

Hazardous Materials Removal Workers Salary: North Dakota vs Tennessee

Hazardous Materials Removal Workers earn a median of $60,160 in North Dakota and $60,090 in Tennessee. That is a nominal gap of $70 (+0.1%), with North Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$60,160
North Dakota median
$67,627 after COL
$60,090
Tennessee median
$65,408 after COL
+0.1%
Nominal gap
North Dakota leads
+3.4%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, North Dakota pays $70 more per year than Tennessee for hazardous materials removal workers, a gap of +0.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, North Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,219 of extra purchasing power (+3.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for hazardous materials removal workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Hazardous Materials Removal Workers

North Dakota

Median salary
$60,160
Mean salary
$54,970
Employment
170
Location quotient
1.18
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$67,627
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Hazardous Materials Removal Workers page for North Dakota →

Hazardous Materials Removal Workers

Tennessee

Median salary
$60,090
Mean salary
$63,480
Employment
570
Location quotient
0.53
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$65,408
Regional Price Parity
91.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Hazardous Materials Removal Workers page for Tennessee →

Related pages

Keep digging into hazardous materials removal workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.