Skip to content
uswages .org

Health Education Specialists Salary: Oregon vs Minnesota

Health Education Specialists earn a median of $75,500 in Oregon and $78,400 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $2,900 (-3.7%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$75,500
Oregon median
$73,045 after COL
$78,400
Minnesota median
$79,496 after COL
-3.7%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
-8.1%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $2,900 more per year than Oregon for health education specialists, a gap of +3.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,451 of extra purchasing power (+8.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for health education specialists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Health Education Specialists

Oregon

Median salary
$75,500
Mean salary
$81,440
Employment
840
Location quotient
1.01
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$73,045
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Health Education Specialists page for Oregon →

Health Education Specialists

Minnesota

Median salary
$78,400
Mean salary
$78,300
Employment
1,250
Location quotient
1.00
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$79,496
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Health Education Specialists page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into health education specialists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.