Skip to content
uswages .org

Healthcare Social Workers Salary: Oregon vs Vermont

Healthcare Social Workers earn a median of $84,350 in Oregon and $81,140 in Vermont. That is a nominal gap of $3,210 (+4.0%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$84,350
Oregon median
$81,607 after COL
$81,140
Vermont median
$82,831 after COL
+4.0%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-1.5%
Adjusted gap
Vermont leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $3,210 more per year than Vermont for healthcare social workers, a gap of +4.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Vermont actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,224 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.5% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for healthcare social workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Healthcare Social Workers

Oregon

Median salary
$84,350
Mean salary
$85,830
Employment
2,320
Location quotient
0.98
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$81,607
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Healthcare Social Workers page for Oregon →

Healthcare Social Workers

Vermont

Median salary
$81,140
Mean salary
$82,720
Employment
250
Location quotient
0.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$82,831
Regional Price Parity
98.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Healthcare Social Workers page for Vermont →

Related pages

Keep digging into healthcare social workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.