Skip to content
uswages .org

Hearing Aid Specialists Salary: California vs Nevada

Hearing Aid Specialists earn a median of $80,060 in California and $81,800 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $1,740 (-2.1%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$80,060
California median
$72,309 after COL
$81,800
Nevada median
$81,817 after COL
-2.1%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-11.6%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $1,740 more per year than California for hearing aid specialists, a gap of +2.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,509 of extra purchasing power (+11.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for hearing aid specialists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Hearing Aid Specialists

California

Median salary
$80,060
Mean salary
$74,990
Employment
990
Location quotient
0.75
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$72,309
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Hearing Aid Specialists page for California →

Hearing Aid Specialists

Nevada

Median salary
$81,800
Mean salary
$76,280
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.57
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$81,817
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Hearing Aid Specialists page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into hearing aid specialists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.