Skip to content
uswages .org

Helpers--Production Workers Salary: Iowa vs Montana

Helpers--Production Workers earn a median of $45,560 in Iowa and $46,110 in Montana. That is a nominal gap of $550 (-1.2%), with Montana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$45,560
Iowa median
$51,913 after COL
$46,110
Montana median
$48,719 after COL
-1.2%
Nominal gap
Montana leads
+6.6%
Adjusted gap
Iowa leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Montana pays $550 more per year than Iowa for helpers--production workers, a gap of +1.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Iowa actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,194 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.6% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for helpers--production workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Helpers--Production Workers

Iowa

Median salary
$45,560
Mean salary
$45,840
Employment
2,070
Location quotient
1.25
Jobs per 1,000
1.3
COL-adjusted median
$51,913
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Helpers--Production Workers page for Iowa →

Helpers--Production Workers

Montana

Median salary
$46,110
Mean salary
$43,500
Employment
220
Location quotient
0.41
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$48,719
Regional Price Parity
94.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Helpers--Production Workers page for Montana →

Related pages

Keep digging into helpers--production workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.