Skip to content
uswages .org

Helpers--Production Workers Salary: Oregon vs Connecticut

Helpers--Production Workers earn a median of $45,390 in Oregon and $45,260 in Connecticut. That is a nominal gap of $130 (+0.3%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$45,390
Oregon median
$43,914 after COL
$45,260
Connecticut median
$43,683 after COL
+0.3%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
+0.5%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $130 more per year than Connecticut for helpers--production workers, a gap of +0.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $231 of extra purchasing power (+0.5% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for helpers--production workers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Helpers--Production Workers

Oregon

Median salary
$45,390
Mean salary
$45,850
Employment
2,420
Location quotient
1.15
Jobs per 1,000
1.2
COL-adjusted median
$43,914
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Helpers--Production Workers page for Oregon →

Helpers--Production Workers

Connecticut

Median salary
$45,260
Mean salary
$45,890
Employment
1,400
Location quotient
0.77
Jobs per 1,000
0.8
COL-adjusted median
$43,683
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Helpers--Production Workers page for Connecticut →

Related pages

Keep digging into helpers--production workers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.