Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Human Resources Managers Salary: Colorado vs New York

Human Resources Managers earn a median of $154,500 in Colorado and $171,440 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $16,940 (-9.9%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$154,500
Colorado median
$149,924 after COL
$171,440
New York median
$158,857 after COL
-9.9%
Nominal gap
New York leads
-5.6%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $16,940 more per year than Colorado for human resources managers, a gap of +9.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,933 of extra purchasing power (+5.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for human resources managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Human Resources Managers

Colorado

Median salary
$154,500
Mean salary
$166,110
Employment
N/A
Location quotient
N/A
Jobs per 1,000
N/A
COL-adjusted median
$149,924
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Human Resources Managers page for Colorado →

Human Resources Managers

New York

Median salary
$171,440
Mean salary
$192,040
Employment
16,720
Location quotient
1.25
Jobs per 1,000
1.8
COL-adjusted median
$158,857
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Human Resources Managers page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into human resources managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.