Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Human Resources Managers Salary: Kentucky vs New Jersey

Human Resources Managers earn a median of $113,740 in Kentucky and $166,070 in New Jersey. That is a nominal gap of $52,330 (-31.5%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$113,740
Kentucky median
$126,155 after COL
$166,070
New Jersey median
$152,631 after COL
-31.5%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
-17.3%
Adjusted gap
New Jersey leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $52,330 more per year than Kentucky for human resources managers, a gap of +31.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Jersey still comes out ahead, with roughly $26,476 of extra purchasing power (+17.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for human resources managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Human Resources Managers

Kentucky

Median salary
$113,740
Mean salary
$122,370
Employment
1,840
Location quotient
0.66
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$126,155
Regional Price Parity
90.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Human Resources Managers page for Kentucky →

Human Resources Managers

New Jersey

Median salary
$166,070
Mean salary
$179,340
Employment
6,470
Location quotient
1.09
Jobs per 1,000
1.5
COL-adjusted median
$152,631
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Human Resources Managers page for New Jersey →

Related pages

Keep digging into human resources managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.