Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Human Resources Specialists Salary: Iowa vs Washington

Human Resources Specialists earn a median of $64,920 in Iowa and $83,230 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $18,310 (-22.0%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$64,920
Iowa median
$73,973 after COL
$83,230
Washington median
$77,776 after COL
-22.0%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-4.9%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $18,310 more per year than Iowa for human resources specialists, a gap of +22.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $3,803 of extra purchasing power (+4.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for human resources specialists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Human Resources Specialists

Iowa

Median salary
$64,920
Mean salary
$71,660
Employment
7,780
Location quotient
0.84
Jobs per 1,000
5.0
COL-adjusted median
$73,973
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Human Resources Specialists page for Iowa →

Human Resources Specialists

Washington

Median salary
$83,230
Mean salary
$93,800
Employment
25,110
Location quotient
1.19
Jobs per 1,000
7.1
COL-adjusted median
$77,776
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Human Resources Specialists page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into human resources specialists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.