Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Human Resources Specialists Salary: Utah vs New York

Human Resources Specialists earn a median of $67,620 in Utah and $81,140 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $13,520 (-16.7%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$67,620
Utah median
$68,397 after COL
$81,140
New York median
$75,185 after COL
-16.7%
Nominal gap
New York leads
-9.0%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $13,520 more per year than Utah for human resources specialists, a gap of +16.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,788 of extra purchasing power (+9.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for human resources specialists in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Human Resources Specialists

Utah

Median salary
$67,620
Mean salary
$75,190
Employment
10,450
Location quotient
1.03
Jobs per 1,000
6.1
COL-adjusted median
$68,397
Regional Price Parity
98.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Human Resources Specialists page for Utah →

Human Resources Specialists

New York

Median salary
$81,140
Mean salary
$91,490
Employment
53,030
Location quotient
0.93
Jobs per 1,000
5.6
COL-adjusted median
$75,185
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Human Resources Specialists page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into human resources specialists from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.