Skip to content
uswages .org

Industrial Production Managers Salary: Connecticut vs New Hampshire

Industrial Production Managers earn a median of $134,780 in Connecticut and $146,590 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $11,810 (-8.1%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$134,780
Connecticut median
$130,084 after COL
$146,590
New Hampshire median
$140,729 after COL
-8.1%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
-7.6%
Adjusted gap
New Hampshire leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $11,810 more per year than Connecticut for industrial production managers, a gap of +8.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New Hampshire still comes out ahead, with roughly $10,645 of extra purchasing power (+7.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for industrial production managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Industrial Production Managers

Connecticut

Median salary
$134,780
Mean salary
$139,480
Employment
3,360
Location quotient
1.25
Jobs per 1,000
2.0
COL-adjusted median
$130,084
Regional Price Parity
103.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Industrial Production Managers page for Connecticut →

Industrial Production Managers

New Hampshire

Median salary
$146,590
Mean salary
$156,150
Employment
1,540
Location quotient
1.42
Jobs per 1,000
2.3
COL-adjusted median
$140,729
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Industrial Production Managers page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into industrial production managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.