Skip to content
uswages .org

Information Security Analysts Salary: California vs Washington

Information Security Analysts earn a median of $138,570 in California and $154,940 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $16,370 (-10.6%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$138,570
California median
$125,154 after COL
$154,940
Washington median
$144,786 after COL
-10.6%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-13.6%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $16,370 more per year than California for information security analysts, a gap of +10.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $19,633 of extra purchasing power (+13.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for information security analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Information Security Analysts

California

Median salary
$138,570
Mean salary
$149,090
Employment
15,570
Location quotient
0.70
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$125,154
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Information Security Analysts page for California →

Information Security Analysts

Washington

Median salary
$154,940
Mean salary
$156,080
Employment
6,030
Location quotient
1.38
Jobs per 1,000
1.7
COL-adjusted median
$144,786
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Information Security Analysts page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into information security analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.