Skip to content
uswages .org

Information Security Analysts Salary: Virginia vs Massachusetts

Information Security Analysts earn a median of $134,900 in Virginia and $136,550 in Massachusetts. That is a nominal gap of $1,650 (-1.2%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$134,900
Virginia median
$133,427 after COL
$136,550
Massachusetts median
$129,117 after COL
-1.2%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
+3.3%
Adjusted gap
Virginia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $1,650 more per year than Virginia for information security analysts, a gap of +1.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Virginia actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $4,310 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.3% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for information security analysts in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Information Security Analysts

Virginia

Median salary
$134,900
Mean salary
$141,360
Employment
19,120
Location quotient
3.80
Jobs per 1,000
4.7
COL-adjusted median
$133,427
Regional Price Parity
101.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Information Security Analysts page for Virginia →

Information Security Analysts

Massachusetts

Median salary
$136,550
Mean salary
$151,000
Employment
6,100
Location quotient
1.37
Jobs per 1,000
1.7
COL-adjusted median
$129,117
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Information Security Analysts page for Massachusetts →

Related pages

Keep digging into information security analysts from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.