Skip to content
uswages .org

Insulation Workers, Mechanical Salary: Minnesota vs Nevada

Insulation Workers, Mechanical earn a median of $105,670 in Minnesota and $114,130 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $8,460 (-7.4%), with Nevada paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$105,670
Minnesota median
$107,148 after COL
$114,130
Nevada median
$114,154 after COL
-7.4%
Nominal gap
Nevada leads
-6.1%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Nevada pays $8,460 more per year than Minnesota for insulation workers, mechanical, a gap of +7.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Nevada still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,006 of extra purchasing power (+6.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for insulation workers, mechanical in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Insulation Workers, Mechanical

Minnesota

Median salary
$105,670
Mean salary
$91,920
Employment
250
Location quotient
0.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$107,148
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Insulation Workers, Mechanical page for Minnesota →

Insulation Workers, Mechanical

Nevada

Median salary
$114,130
Mean salary
$97,960
Employment
250
Location quotient
0.97
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$114,154
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Insulation Workers, Mechanical page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into insulation workers, mechanical from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.