Skip to content
uswages .org

Insurance Underwriters Salary: Wisconsin vs New Hampshire

Insurance Underwriters earn a median of $97,370 in Wisconsin and $103,940 in New Hampshire. That is a nominal gap of $6,570 (-6.3%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$97,370
Wisconsin median
$103,481 after COL
$103,940
New Hampshire median
$99,784 after COL
-6.3%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
+3.7%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $6,570 more per year than Wisconsin for insurance underwriters, a gap of +6.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Wisconsin actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,697 more in national-price-level terms (a +3.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for insurance underwriters in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Insurance Underwriters

Wisconsin

Median salary
$97,370
Mean salary
$95,410
Employment
3,110
Location quotient
1.56
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$103,481
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Insurance Underwriters page for Wisconsin →

Insurance Underwriters

New Hampshire

Median salary
$103,940
Mean salary
$109,760
Employment
270
Location quotient
0.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$99,784
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Insurance Underwriters page for New Hampshire →

Related pages

Keep digging into insurance underwriters from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.