Skip to content
uswages .org

Interior Designers Salary: Washington vs Illinois

Interior Designers earn a median of $76,570 in Washington and $76,290 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $280 (+0.4%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$76,570
Washington median
$71,552 after COL
$76,290
Illinois median
$76,322 after COL
+0.4%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-6.2%
Adjusted gap
Illinois leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $280 more per year than Illinois for interior designers, a gap of +0.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Illinois actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $4,770 more in national-price-level terms (a +6.2% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for interior designers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Interior Designers

Washington

Median salary
$76,570
Mean salary
$81,360
Employment
1,330
Location quotient
0.81
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$71,552
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Interior Designers page for Washington →

Interior Designers

Illinois

Median salary
$76,290
Mean salary
$85,520
Employment
2,570
Location quotient
0.92
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$76,322
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Interior Designers page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into interior designers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.