Skip to content
uswages .org

Interpreters And Translators Salary: Massachusetts vs District of Columbia

Interpreters And Translators earn a median of $72,750 in Massachusetts and $109,970 in District of Columbia. That is a nominal gap of $37,220 (-33.8%), with District of Columbia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$72,750
Massachusetts median
$68,790 after COL
$109,970
District of Columbia median
$100,063 after COL
-33.8%
Nominal gap
District of Columbia leads
-31.3%
Adjusted gap
District of Columbia leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, District of Columbia pays $37,220 more per year than Massachusetts for interpreters and translators, a gap of +33.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, District of Columbia still comes out ahead, with roughly $31,273 of extra purchasing power (+31.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for interpreters and translators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Interpreters And Translators

Massachusetts

Median salary
$72,750
Mean salary
$79,140
Employment
2,280
Location quotient
1.87
Jobs per 1,000
0.6
COL-adjusted median
$68,790
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Interpreters And Translators page for Massachusetts →

Interpreters And Translators

District of Columbia

Median salary
$109,970
Mean salary
$102,960
Employment
280
Location quotient
1.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$100,063
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Interpreters And Translators page for District of Columbia →

Related pages

Keep digging into interpreters and translators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.