Skip to content
uswages .org

Interviewers, Except Eligibility And Loan Salary: District of Columbia vs Washington

Interviewers, Except Eligibility And Loan earn a median of $49,730 in District of Columbia and $51,090 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $1,360 (-2.7%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,730
District of Columbia median
$45,250 after COL
$51,090
Washington median
$47,742 after COL
-2.7%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-5.2%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $1,360 more per year than District of Columbia for interviewers, except eligibility and loan, a gap of +2.7%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $2,492 of extra purchasing power (+5.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for interviewers, except eligibility and loan in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Interviewers, Except Eligibility And Loan

District of Columbia

Median salary
$49,730
Mean salary
$62,490
Employment
640
Location quotient
0.96
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$45,250
Regional Price Parity
109.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Interviewers, Except Eligibility And Loan page for District of Columbia →

Interviewers, Except Eligibility And Loan

Washington

Median salary
$51,090
Mean salary
$53,640
Employment
3,050
Location quotient
0.90
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$47,742
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Interviewers, Except Eligibility And Loan page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into interviewers, except eligibility and loan from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.