Skip to content
uswages .org

Judicial Law Clerks Salary: California vs North Dakota

Judicial Law Clerks earn a median of $79,030 in California and $85,530 in North Dakota. That is a nominal gap of $6,500 (-7.6%), with North Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$79,030
California median
$71,378 after COL
$85,530
North Dakota median
$96,145 after COL
-7.6%
Nominal gap
North Dakota leads
-25.8%
Adjusted gap
North Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, North Dakota pays $6,500 more per year than California for judicial law clerks, a gap of +7.6%.

After adjusting for cost of living, North Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $24,767 of extra purchasing power (+25.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for judicial law clerks in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Judicial Law Clerks

California

Median salary
$79,030
Mean salary
$76,070
Employment
1,800
Location quotient
1.15
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$71,378
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Judicial Law Clerks page for California →

Judicial Law Clerks

North Dakota

Median salary
$85,530
Mean salary
$89,920
Employment
40
Location quotient
1.19
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$96,145
Regional Price Parity
89.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Judicial Law Clerks page for North Dakota →

Related pages

Keep digging into judicial law clerks from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.