Skip to content
uswages .org

Kindergarten Teachers, Except Special Education Salary: California vs Rhode Island

Kindergarten Teachers, Except Special Education earn a median of $82,550 in California and $85,470 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $2,920 (-3.4%), with Rhode Island paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$82,550
California median
$74,557 after COL
$85,470
Rhode Island median
$83,565 after COL
-3.4%
Nominal gap
Rhode Island leads
-10.8%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Rhode Island pays $2,920 more per year than California for kindergarten teachers, except special education, a gap of +3.4%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Rhode Island still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,007 of extra purchasing power (+10.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for kindergarten teachers, except special education in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Kindergarten Teachers, Except Special Education

California

Median salary
$82,550
Mean salary
$88,160
Employment
7,430
Location quotient
0.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.4
COL-adjusted median
$74,557
Regional Price Parity
110.7%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Kindergarten Teachers, Except Special Education page for California →

Kindergarten Teachers, Except Special Education

Rhode Island

Median salary
$85,470
Mean salary
$77,600
Employment
360
Location quotient
1.02
Jobs per 1,000
0.7
COL-adjusted median
$83,565
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Kindergarten Teachers, Except Special Education page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into kindergarten teachers, except special education from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.