Skip to content
uswages .org

Law Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Minnesota vs Wisconsin

Law Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $171,790 in Minnesota and $140,940 in Wisconsin. That is a nominal gap of $30,850 (+21.9%), with Minnesota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$171,790
Minnesota median
$174,192 after COL
$140,940
Wisconsin median
$149,785 after COL
+21.9%
Nominal gap
Minnesota leads
+16.3%
Adjusted gap
Minnesota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Minnesota pays $30,850 more per year than Wisconsin for law teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +21.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Minnesota still comes out ahead, with roughly $24,407 of extra purchasing power (+16.3% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for law teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Law Teachers, Postsecondary

Minnesota

Median salary
$171,790
Mean salary
$163,760
Employment
80
Location quotient
0.21
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$174,192
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Law Teachers, Postsecondary page for Minnesota →

Law Teachers, Postsecondary

Wisconsin

Median salary
$140,940
Mean salary
$157,180
Employment
150
Location quotient
0.40
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$149,785
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Law Teachers, Postsecondary page for Wisconsin →

Related pages

Keep digging into law teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.