Skip to content
uswages .org

Law Teachers, Postsecondary Salary: Wisconsin vs Michigan

Law Teachers, Postsecondary earn a median of $140,940 in Wisconsin and $141,680 in Michigan. That is a nominal gap of $740 (-0.5%), with Michigan paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$140,940
Wisconsin median
$149,785 after COL
$141,680
Michigan median
$147,250 after COL
-0.5%
Nominal gap
Michigan leads
+1.7%
Adjusted gap
Wisconsin leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Michigan pays $740 more per year than Wisconsin for law teachers, postsecondary, a gap of +0.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Wisconsin actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $2,534 more in national-price-level terms (a +1.7% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for law teachers, postsecondary in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Law Teachers, Postsecondary

Wisconsin

Median salary
$140,940
Mean salary
$157,180
Employment
150
Location quotient
0.40
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$149,785
Regional Price Parity
94.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Law Teachers, Postsecondary page for Wisconsin →

Law Teachers, Postsecondary

Michigan

Median salary
$141,680
Mean salary
$173,330
Employment
330
Location quotient
0.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$147,250
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Law Teachers, Postsecondary page for Michigan →

Related pages

Keep digging into law teachers, postsecondary from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.