Skip to content
uswages .org

Legal Support Workers, All Other Salary: Kansas vs Minnesota

Legal Support Workers, All Other earn a median of $88,210 in Kansas and $86,940 in Minnesota. That is a nominal gap of $1,270 (+1.5%), with Kansas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$88,210
Kansas median
$97,937 after COL
$86,940
Minnesota median
$88,156 after COL
+1.5%
Nominal gap
Kansas leads
+11.1%
Adjusted gap
Kansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Kansas pays $1,270 more per year than Minnesota for legal support workers, all other, a gap of +1.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Kansas still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,781 of extra purchasing power (+11.1% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for legal support workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Legal Support Workers, All Other

Kansas

Median salary
$88,210
Mean salary
$91,530
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.14
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$97,937
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Legal Support Workers, All Other page for Kansas →

Legal Support Workers, All Other

Minnesota

Median salary
$86,940
Mean salary
$95,190
Employment
220
Location quotient
0.25
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$88,156
Regional Price Parity
98.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Legal Support Workers, All Other page for Minnesota →

Related pages

Keep digging into legal support workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.