Skip to content
uswages .org

Light Truck Drivers Salary: Massachusetts vs Washington

Light Truck Drivers earn a median of $48,110 in Massachusetts and $49,070 in Washington. That is a nominal gap of $960 (-2.0%), with Washington paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,110
Massachusetts median
$45,491 after COL
$49,070
Washington median
$45,854 after COL
-2.0%
Nominal gap
Washington leads
-0.8%
Adjusted gap
Washington leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Washington pays $960 more per year than Massachusetts for light truck drivers, a gap of +2.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Washington still comes out ahead, with roughly $363 of extra purchasing power (+0.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for light truck drivers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Light Truck Drivers

Massachusetts

Median salary
$48,110
Mean salary
$51,410
Employment
23,350
Location quotient
1.02
Jobs per 1,000
6.4
COL-adjusted median
$45,491
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Light Truck Drivers page for Massachusetts →

Light Truck Drivers

Washington

Median salary
$49,070
Mean salary
$53,520
Employment
23,290
Location quotient
1.04
Jobs per 1,000
6.6
COL-adjusted median
$45,854
Regional Price Parity
107.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Light Truck Drivers page for Washington →

Related pages

Keep digging into light truck drivers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.