Skip to content
uswages .org

Lighting Technicians Salary: Oklahoma vs Georgia

Lighting Technicians earn a median of $67,110 in Oklahoma and $70,150 in Georgia. That is a nominal gap of $3,040 (-4.3%), with Georgia paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$67,110
Oklahoma median
$76,398 after COL
$70,150
Georgia median
$72,851 after COL
-4.3%
Nominal gap
Georgia leads
+4.9%
Adjusted gap
Oklahoma leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Georgia pays $3,040 more per year than Oklahoma for lighting technicians, a gap of +4.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Oklahoma actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $3,547 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for lighting technicians in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Lighting Technicians

Oklahoma

Median salary
$67,110
Mean salary
$74,340
Employment
60
Location quotient
0.58
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$76,398
Regional Price Parity
87.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Lighting Technicians page for Oklahoma →

Lighting Technicians

Georgia

Median salary
$70,150
Mean salary
$80,730
Employment
260
Location quotient
0.94
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$72,851
Regional Price Parity
96.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Lighting Technicians page for Georgia →

Related pages

Keep digging into lighting technicians from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.