Skip to content
uswages .org

Log Graders And Scalers Salary: Michigan vs Oregon

Log Graders And Scalers earn a median of $51,810 in Michigan and $60,250 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $8,440 (-14.0%), with Oregon paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$51,810
Michigan median
$53,847 after COL
$60,250
Oregon median
$58,291 after COL
-14.0%
Nominal gap
Oregon leads
-7.6%
Adjusted gap
Oregon leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Oregon pays $8,440 more per year than Michigan for log graders and scalers, a gap of +14.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Oregon still comes out ahead, with roughly $4,444 of extra purchasing power (+7.6% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for log graders and scalers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Log Graders And Scalers

Michigan

Median salary
$51,810
Mean salary
$54,300
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.52
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$53,847
Regional Price Parity
96.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Log Graders And Scalers page for Michigan →

Log Graders And Scalers

Oregon

Median salary
$60,250
Mean salary
$59,030
Employment
50
Location quotient
1.37
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$58,291
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Log Graders And Scalers page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into log graders and scalers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.