Skip to content
uswages .org

Logging Equipment Operators Salary: Arkansas vs Illinois

Logging Equipment Operators earn a median of $48,280 in Arkansas and $71,100 in Illinois. That is a nominal gap of $22,820 (-32.1%), with Illinois paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$48,280
Arkansas median
$55,534 after COL
$71,100
Illinois median
$71,130 after COL
-32.1%
Nominal gap
Illinois leads
-21.9%
Adjusted gap
Illinois leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Illinois pays $22,820 more per year than Arkansas for logging equipment operators, a gap of +32.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Illinois still comes out ahead, with roughly $15,595 of extra purchasing power (+21.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for logging equipment operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Logging Equipment Operators

Arkansas

Median salary
$48,280
Mean salary
$48,830
Employment
1,280
Location quotient
7.26
Jobs per 1,000
1.0
COL-adjusted median
$55,534
Regional Price Parity
86.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Logging Equipment Operators page for Arkansas →

Logging Equipment Operators

Illinois

Median salary
$71,100
Mean salary
$62,930
Employment
40
Location quotient
0.05
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$71,130
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Logging Equipment Operators page for Illinois →

Related pages

Keep digging into logging equipment operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.