Skip to content
uswages .org

Logging Equipment Operators Salary: Mississippi vs Texas

Logging Equipment Operators earn a median of $49,620 in Mississippi and $62,890 in Texas. That is a nominal gap of $13,270 (-21.1%), with Texas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$49,620
Mississippi median
$57,065 after COL
$62,890
Texas median
$64,797 after COL
-21.1%
Nominal gap
Texas leads
-11.9%
Adjusted gap
Texas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Texas pays $13,270 more per year than Mississippi for logging equipment operators, a gap of +21.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Texas still comes out ahead, with roughly $7,732 of extra purchasing power (+11.9% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for logging equipment operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Logging Equipment Operators

Mississippi

Median salary
$49,620
Mean salary
$47,520
Employment
1,220
Location quotient
7.77
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$57,065
Regional Price Parity
87.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Logging Equipment Operators page for Mississippi →

Logging Equipment Operators

Texas

Median salary
$62,890
Mean salary
$56,190
Employment
500
Location quotient
0.26
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$64,797
Regional Price Parity
97.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Logging Equipment Operators page for Texas →

Related pages

Keep digging into logging equipment operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.