Skip to content
uswages .org

Logging Equipment Operators Salary: South Dakota vs Oregon

Logging Equipment Operators earn a median of $58,740 in South Dakota and $58,720 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $20 (+0.0%), with South Dakota paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$58,740
South Dakota median
$66,308 after COL
$58,720
Oregon median
$56,811 after COL
+0.0%
Nominal gap
South Dakota leads
+16.7%
Adjusted gap
South Dakota leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, South Dakota pays $20 more per year than Oregon for logging equipment operators, a gap of +0.0%.

After adjusting for cost of living, South Dakota still comes out ahead, with roughly $9,498 of extra purchasing power (+16.7% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for logging equipment operators in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Logging Equipment Operators

South Dakota

Median salary
$58,740
Mean salary
$55,770
Employment
50
Location quotient
0.88
Jobs per 1,000
0.1
COL-adjusted median
$66,308
Regional Price Parity
88.6%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Logging Equipment Operators page for South Dakota →

Logging Equipment Operators

Oregon

Median salary
$58,720
Mean salary
$59,670
Employment
1,860
Location quotient
6.98
Jobs per 1,000
0.9
COL-adjusted median
$56,811
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Logging Equipment Operators page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into logging equipment operators from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.