Skip to content
uswages .org

Logging Workers, All Other Salary: Louisiana vs Oregon

Logging Workers, All Other earn a median of $80,930 in Louisiana and $57,890 in Oregon. That is a nominal gap of $23,040 (+39.8%), with Louisiana paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$80,930
Louisiana median
$91,750 after COL
$57,890
Oregon median
$56,008 after COL
+39.8%
Nominal gap
Louisiana leads
+63.8%
Adjusted gap
Louisiana leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Louisiana pays $23,040 more per year than Oregon for logging workers, all other, a gap of +39.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Louisiana still comes out ahead, with roughly $35,743 of extra purchasing power (+63.8% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for logging workers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Logging Workers, All Other

Louisiana

Median salary
$80,930
Mean salary
$70,960
Employment
30
Location quotient
1.51
Jobs per 1,000
0.0
COL-adjusted median
$91,750
Regional Price Parity
88.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Logging Workers, All Other page for Louisiana →

Logging Workers, All Other

Oregon

Median salary
$57,890
Mean salary
$56,930
Employment
590
Location quotient
27.21
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$56,008
Regional Price Parity
103.4%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Logging Workers, All Other page for Oregon →

Related pages

Keep digging into logging workers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.