Skip to content
uswages .org

Machine Feeders And Offbearers Salary: New Hampshire vs Kansas

Machine Feeders And Offbearers earn a median of $46,580 in New Hampshire and $47,930 in Kansas. That is a nominal gap of $1,350 (-2.8%), with Kansas paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$46,580
New Hampshire median
$44,718 after COL
$47,930
Kansas median
$53,215 after COL
-2.8%
Nominal gap
Kansas leads
-16.0%
Adjusted gap
Kansas leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Kansas pays $1,350 more per year than New Hampshire for machine feeders and offbearers, a gap of +2.8%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Kansas still comes out ahead, with roughly $8,498 of extra purchasing power (+16.0% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for machine feeders and offbearers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Machine Feeders And Offbearers

New Hampshire

Median salary
$46,580
Mean salary
$46,670
Employment
200
Location quotient
1.07
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$44,718
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Machine Feeders And Offbearers page for New Hampshire →

Machine Feeders And Offbearers

Kansas

Median salary
$47,930
Mean salary
$48,280
Employment
430
Location quotient
1.11
Jobs per 1,000
0.3
COL-adjusted median
$53,215
Regional Price Parity
90.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Machine Feeders And Offbearers page for Kansas →

Related pages

Keep digging into machine feeders and offbearers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.