Skip to content
uswages .org

Maintenance Workers, Machinery Salary: New Hampshire vs Nevada

Maintenance Workers, Machinery earn a median of $77,070 in New Hampshire and $75,500 in Nevada. That is a nominal gap of $1,570 (+2.1%), with New Hampshire paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$77,070
New Hampshire median
$73,988 after COL
$75,500
Nevada median
$75,516 after COL
+2.1%
Nominal gap
New Hampshire leads
-2.0%
Adjusted gap
Nevada leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Hampshire pays $1,570 more per year than Nevada for maintenance workers, machinery, a gap of +2.1%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Nevada actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $1,527 more in national-price-level terms (a +2.0% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for maintenance workers, machinery in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Maintenance Workers, Machinery

New Hampshire

Median salary
$77,070
Mean salary
$70,470
Employment
130
Location quotient
0.48
Jobs per 1,000
0.2
COL-adjusted median
$73,988
Regional Price Parity
104.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Maintenance Workers, Machinery page for New Hampshire →

Maintenance Workers, Machinery

Nevada

Median salary
$75,500
Mean salary
$72,140
Employment
750
Location quotient
1.25
Jobs per 1,000
0.5
COL-adjusted median
$75,516
Regional Price Parity
100.0%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Maintenance Workers, Machinery page for Nevada →

Related pages

Keep digging into maintenance workers, machinery from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.