Skip to content
uswages .org

Managers, All Other Salary: Massachusetts vs Colorado

Managers, All Other earn a median of $182,950 in Massachusetts and $171,140 in Colorado. That is a nominal gap of $11,810 (+6.9%), with Massachusetts paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2025 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$182,950
Massachusetts median
$172,991 after COL
$171,140
Colorado median
$166,071 after COL
+6.9%
Nominal gap
Massachusetts leads
+4.2%
Adjusted gap
Massachusetts leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Massachusetts pays $11,810 more per year than Colorado for managers, all other, a gap of +6.9%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Massachusetts still comes out ahead, with roughly $6,919 of extra purchasing power (+4.2% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for managers, all other in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Managers, All Other

Massachusetts

Median salary
$182,950
Mean salary
$198,080
Employment
10,630
Location quotient
0.73
Jobs per 1,000
2.9
COL-adjusted median
$172,991
Regional Price Parity
105.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Managers, All Other page for Massachusetts →

Managers, All Other

Colorado

Median salary
$171,140
Mean salary
$182,760
Employment
14,060
Location quotient
1.22
Jobs per 1,000
4.9
COL-adjusted median
$166,071
Regional Price Parity
103.1%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Managers, All Other page for Colorado →

Related pages

Keep digging into managers, all other from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.