Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Marketing Managers Salary: Greensboro-High Point, NC vs Worcester, MA

Marketing Managers earn a median of $135,290 in Greensboro-High Point, NC and $176,500 in Worcester, MA. That is a nominal gap of $41,210 (-23.3%), with Worcester, MA paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$135,290
Greensboro-High Point, NC median
$145,685 after COL
$176,500
Worcester, MA median
$172,156 after COL
-23.3%
Nominal gap
Worcester, MA leads
-15.4%
Adjusted gap
Worcester, MA leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, Worcester, MA pays $41,210 more per year than Greensboro-High Point, NC for marketing managers, a gap of +23.3%.

After adjusting for cost of living, Worcester, MA still comes out ahead, with roughly $26,472 of extra purchasing power (+15.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for marketing managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Marketing Managers

Greensboro-High Point, NC

Median salary
$135,290
Mean salary
$166,710
Employment
580
Location quotient
0.65
Jobs per 1,000
1.6
COL-adjusted median
$145,685
Regional Price Parity
92.9%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for Greensboro-High Point, NC →

Marketing Managers

Worcester, MA

Median salary
$176,500
Mean salary
$182,270
Employment
650
Location quotient
0.74
Jobs per 1,000
1.9
COL-adjusted median
$172,156
Regional Price Parity
102.5%

Exact metro RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for Worcester, MA →

Related pages

Keep digging into marketing managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a metro specializes in.