Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Marketing Managers Salary: Kentucky vs New York

Marketing Managers earn a median of $123,480 in Kentucky and $172,590 in New York. That is a nominal gap of $49,110 (-28.5%), with New York paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$123,480
Kentucky median
$136,958 after COL
$172,590
New York median
$159,923 after COL
-28.5%
Nominal gap
New York leads
-14.4%
Adjusted gap
New York leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New York pays $49,110 more per year than Kentucky for marketing managers, a gap of +28.5%.

After adjusting for cost of living, New York still comes out ahead, with roughly $22,964 of extra purchasing power (+14.4% real gap). Local prices do not reverse the nominal advantage.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for marketing managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Marketing Managers

Kentucky

Median salary
$123,480
Mean salary
$134,320
Employment
2,130
Location quotient
0.43
Jobs per 1,000
1.1
COL-adjusted median
$136,958
Regional Price Parity
90.2%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for Kentucky →

Marketing Managers

New York

Median salary
$172,590
Mean salary
$195,720
Employment
49,480
Location quotient
2.08
Jobs per 1,000
5.2
COL-adjusted median
$159,923
Regional Price Parity
107.9%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for New York →

Related pages

Keep digging into marketing managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.