Skip to content

An independent salary reference. Not affiliated with BLS or any U.S. government agency.

Salary data from BLS Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics

Marketing Managers Salary: New Jersey vs Rhode Island

Marketing Managers earn a median of $173,310 in New Jersey and $171,250 in Rhode Island. That is a nominal gap of $2,060 (+1.2%), with New Jersey paying more before any cost-of-living adjustment.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics survey, May 2024 estimates. Cost-of-living adjustment uses BEA Regional Price Parities, most recent release.

$173,310
New Jersey median
$159,285 after COL
$171,250
Rhode Island median
$167,433 after COL
+1.2%
Nominal gap
New Jersey leads
-4.9%
Adjusted gap
Rhode Island leads after COL

The story behind the numbers

On raw wages, New Jersey pays $2,060 more per year than Rhode Island for marketing managers, a gap of +1.2%.

After adjusting for cost of living, the picture flips. Rhode Island actually offers more purchasing power, effectively paying $8,148 more in national-price-level terms (a +4.9% real gap). The higher nominal wage in the other location is eaten up by higher local prices.

Full breakdown by location

Detailed wage, employment, and cost-of-living figures for marketing managers in each location. Click through to the full local salary page for percentiles, outlook, and peer areas.

Marketing Managers

New Jersey

Median salary
$173,310
Mean salary
$190,930
Employment
11,750
Location quotient
1.11
Jobs per 1,000
2.8
COL-adjusted median
$159,285
Regional Price Parity
108.8%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for New Jersey →

Marketing Managers

Rhode Island

Median salary
$171,250
Mean salary
$174,690
Employment
1,120
Location quotient
0.91
Jobs per 1,000
2.3
COL-adjusted median
$167,433
Regional Price Parity
102.3%

Exact state RPP match.

Full Marketing Managers page for Rhode Island →

Related pages

Keep digging into marketing managers from a different angle.

Common questions about this comparison

What does the cost-of-living adjustment actually do? +

It divides each location's nominal median wage by its Regional Price Parity (RPP), which measures how local prices compare to the national average (100 = national). A wage of $100,000 in an area with RPP 120 has the same purchasing power as roughly $83,000 nationally.

Why would the nominal and adjusted winners disagree? +

High-cost metros often pay higher salaries, but not by enough to fully offset the higher cost of housing, goods, and services. When that happens, the location with the lower nominal wage actually offers more real purchasing power.

What is a location quotient? +

The location quotient measures how concentrated an occupation is in a given area versus the national average. A value of 2.0 means the occupation is twice as common there as nationally. It is a signal of what a state specializes in.